Is the Bible Creditable?

Photo credit: Arron Burden

Sign up for news of new post

Introduction

For nearly two millennia, Christians have confessed that the Bible is the Word of God—trustworthy, true, and inspired. Yet in a world shaped by skepticism, secularism, and shifting moral frameworks, the question arises again: Is the Bible creditable? Can modern readers genuinely trust an ancient book as the foundation of their faith, their lives, and their hope in eternity? The credibility of Scripture is not a trivial matter. If the Bible is unreliable, then the claims of Christ, the witness of the apostles, and the very heart of the gospel collapse. But if the Bible is indeed credible, then it remains the ultimate authority for life and godliness (2 Timothy 3:16-17 NIV). This essay will explore the question of the Bible’s credibility through several lenses: historical reliability, manuscript evidence, fulfilled prophecy, archaeological support, theological consistency, and personal transformation.

Is the Bible Creditable Historically

One of the most direct ways to evaluate the credibility of any ancient text is by considering whether it reliably reflects the historical events it claims to record.

The Gospels present themselves not as myth or allegory but as eyewitness testimony (Luke 1:1–4 NIV; John 21:24 NIV; 1 John 1:1–3 NIV). Luke in particular emphasizes his careful investigation and reliance on direct sources. The book of Acts also demonstrates a remarkable knowledge of first-century geography, politics, and cultural practices—so much so that the classical scholar Sir William Ramsay, initially skeptical, concluded after decades of study that “Luke is a historian of the first rank.”

Non-Christian sources such as Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, and Josephus mention Jesus, the early Christians, or events consistent with the New Testament record. These sources are not favorable to Christianity, yet they corroborate its basic historical framework. In addition, the early dating of many New Testament writings suggests that they were composed within the lifetime of eyewitnesses.

The Manuscript Evidence

The Bible, especially the New Testament, is the best-preserved document of antiquity, and the Old Testament likewise demonstrates remarkable preservation across centuries.

Quantity of Manuscripts

The sheer number of manuscripts supporting the Bible far surpasses any other ancient writing. For the New Testament alone, we have over 5,800 complete or partial Greek manuscripts, more than 10,000 Latin manuscripts, and at least 9,300 in other ancient languages such as Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and Georgian. This brings the total to more than 25,000 manuscripts. In contrast, most classical works of antiquity survive in fewer than a handful of manuscripts. For instance, Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars survives in just about 10 good manuscripts, the earliest of which is nearly 1,000 years removed from Caesar’s time.

This overwhelming quantity of manuscripts provides scholars with a broad base to reconstruct the original text with a high degree of confidence.

Quality and Accuracy

The time gap between the original writings (autographs) and our earliest surviving copies is remarkably short compared to other ancient works. For the New Testament, some fragments (like the John Rylands Papyrus, P52, dating to about AD 125) were written within a generation of the apostles. Entire books and nearly complete New Testaments exist in manuscripts from the third and fourth centuries (e.g., Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus).

Textual criticism—the scholarly discipline that compares manuscript evidence—has demonstrated that the New Testament we possess today is more than 99% textually accurate to the originals. The small percentage of variants are mostly spelling differences, minor word order changes, or omitted/added words that do not affect doctrine.

F. F. Bruce put it this way: “The evidence for our New Testament writings is ever so much greater than the evidence for many writings of classical authors, the authenticity of which no one dreams of questioning.” (The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?, 1960).

The Old Testament Transmission

The Old Testament also demonstrates extraordinary preservation. Jewish scribes treated the Scriptures with reverence, employing precise copying methods to avoid errors. Before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947, the oldest Hebrew manuscripts available were from around the 10th century AD. Critics assumed the text had undergone corruption. However, the Dead Sea Scrolls, dating back to around 200 BC–100 AD, provided copies of nearly every Old Testament book. Remarkably, they revealed that the text had been transmitted with astonishing accuracy across more than a thousand years. For example, Isaiah scrolls found at Qumran are virtually identical in content to the later Masoretic Text, aside from minor spelling differences.

Translations as Evidence

Another line of evidence for the Bible’s manuscript credibility comes from the early translations. By the second and third centuries AD, the New Testament was already being translated into Latin, Syriac, and Coptic. These translations, spread across different regions, provide independent confirmation of the stability of the text. The wide geographical distribution of manuscripts and translations makes it virtually impossible for any centralized authority to have altered the Scriptures in a consistent or conspiratorial way.

Scholarly Consensus

Even many secular and non-Christian scholars agree that the Bible stands as the best-attested work of antiquity. Bart Ehrman, a well-known skeptic of Christianity, nevertheless affirms: “We can say with some confidence that we have what the authors originally wrote” (Misquoting Jesus, 2005). This acknowledgment underscores that disputes over interpretation do not rest on whether we possess the original wording, but on how one responds to its message.

In short, the manuscript evidence for the Bible is unparalleled in the ancient world. With an overwhelming number of manuscripts, an extraordinarily short time gap, the corroboration of early translations, and the fidelity demonstrated by discoveries like the Dead Sea Scrolls, Christians have every reason to trust that the Scriptures we read today faithfully reflect the original inspired writings.

Fulfilled Prophecy

Another dimension of the Bible’s credibility is its prophetic accuracy.

The Old Testament contains numerous prophecies fulfilled in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. For example: born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2 NIV; Matthew 2:1 NIV), pierced for our transgressions (Isaiah 53:5 NIV; John 19:34 NIV), entered Jerusalem on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9 NIV; Matthew 21:5 NIV), betrayed for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12–13; Matthew 26:15).

The Bible also foretells historical events, such as the fall of Babylon (Isaiah 13:19; fulfilled in 539 BC) and the rise of empires (Daniel 2 NIV and Daniel 7 NIV).

Archaeological Support

In addition to the wealth of manuscript evidence, archaeology has played a vital role in confirming the credibility of the Bible. Far from undermining its message, archaeological discoveries repeatedly demonstrate the historical reliability of both the Old and New Testaments. While archaeology cannot prove every event or miracle described in Scripture, it continually affirms the cultural, geographical, and political background against which the biblical narrative is set.

Archaeology and the Old Testament

For centuries, skeptics dismissed much of the Old Testament as mythological, claiming that figures like Abraham or King David were legendary and that the accounts of Israel’s early history were fabricated. Yet archaeological findings have consistently challenged these assumptions.

• The Hittites: The Bible frequently mentions the Hittites (Genesis 15:20; 23:10), but for long time no extra-biblical evidence of their existence had been found. Critics accused the Bible of inventing this nation. However, excavations beginning in the early 20th century uncovered the vast Hittite Empire in modern-day Turkey, with thousands of clay tablets confirming their culture, language, and military might. The once “mythical” Hittites are now a well-established part of Near Eastern history.

  
  

• The Tel Dan Stele: In 1993, archaeologists discovered an inscription in northern Israel mentioning the “House of David.” This was the first historical evidence outside the Bible for King David’s dynasty, confirming that David was not a legendary figure but a real historical ruler.

  
  

• Jericho’s Walls: Excavations at Jericho have revealed collapsed city walls dating back to the time of Joshua. While scholars debate the timing and details, the archaeological record provides strong evidence that Jericho was a heavily fortified city whose walls fell in antiquity, aligning with the biblical narrative in Joshua 6.

  
  

• The Dead Sea Scrolls: While often cited for textual preservation, they also serve as archaeological confirmation of the Jewish religious world at the time of Christ, showing the Scriptures were revered and faithfully transmitted by a real community of Jewish believers.

  
  

Archaeology and the New Testament

The New Testament has also been supported by numerous archaeological discoveries that confirm its historical setting.

• Pontius Pilate Inscription: For years, skeptics argued that Pilate was a fictional invention. That changed in 1961 when archaeologists discovered a limestone inscription at Caesarea Maritima bearing Pilate’s name and title as Prefect of Judea. This confirmed the Gospel accounts that placed Jesus’ trial under Pilate’s authority (Matthew 27:2).

  
  

• The Pool of Bethesda: John 5 describes Jesus healing a paralyzed man at the Pool of Bethesda, which was said to have five porticoes. Critics dismissed this as symbolic fiction until excavations in Jerusalem uncovered the pool exactly as John described—with five colonnades.

  
  

• The Pool of Siloam: Mentioned in John 9, where Jesus healed a blind man, the Pool of Siloam was rediscovered in 2004 by archaeologists. Its remains match the biblical description, further confirming the New Testament’s attention to geographical accuracy.

  
  

• Synagogues of Galilee: The Gospels repeatedly describe Jesus teaching in synagogues throughout Galilee (Mark 1:39). Archaeological excavations in towns like Capernaum and Magdala have uncovered first-century synagogues that align with these descriptions, rooting the Gospel stories in tangible history.

  
  

• Nazareth Inscriptions and Ossuaries: Numerous finds in and around Nazareth and Jerusalem, including burial ossuaries bearing names of biblical figures (such as Caiaphas, the high priest), confirm the existence of the cultural and political world described in the New Testament.

  
  

Archaeology and Historical Accuracy

What makes these discoveries so significant is that they repeatedly validate details the biblical authors included in their narratives. The Bible mentions kings, rulers, cities, and cultural practices that modern archaeology has verified time and again. Renowned archaeologist William F. Albright, once skeptical of the Bible, famously stated:

“Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy of innumerable details, and has brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a source of history.” (The Archaeology of Palestine, 1960).

Nelson Glueck, a Jewish archaeologist, echoed this sentiment:

“It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference.” (Rivers in the Desert, 1959).

Limitations of Archaeology

It is important to note that archaeology cannot confirm every person or event in Scripture. Many biblical figures, especially those of less political importance, may never leave an archaeological trace. Yet the weight of evidence confirms the broader historical and cultural framework of the Bible. The absence of evidence in some cases should not be mistaken for evidence of absence, especially given that much of the ancient world remains unexcavated.

The Implication of Archaeological Support

The archaeological record demonstrates that the Bible is not a book of myths detached from real history but a text rooted in actual people, places, and events. This does not by itself prove the divine inspiration of Scripture, but it strongly supports its credibility as a trustworthy historical document. For believers, these discoveries reinforce faith in the Bible’s reliability. For skeptics, they present compelling reasons to reconsider dismissing the Scriptures as legend or fiction.

Theological Consistency

The Bible is a collection of 66 books written over 1,500 years by more than 40 authors in diverse contexts. Yet it tells one unified story: God’s redemptive plan through Christ.

Despite cultural and historical differences, the Bible demonstrates a coherent theology of creation, fall, covenant, redemption, and restoration.

Transformative Power

While historical, manuscript, prophetic, and archaeological evidence provide strong reasons to trust the Bible, its ultimate credibility is seen in its transformative impact.

The Bible has shaped civilizations, inspired movements for justice, and comforted countless individuals in suffering. More personally, it continues to change lives by bringing people to faith in Christ, sanctifying believers, and offering hope in the face of death.

Addressing Common Objections

Objection 1: “The Bible is full of contradictions.” Many alleged contradictions dissolve upon closer study. Differences in Gospel accounts often reflect complementary perspectives rather than contradictions.

Objection 2: “The Bible has been changed over time.” Manuscript evidence shows that the text has been remarkably preserved. Textual criticism gives confidence that modern translations accurately reflect the original writings.

Objection 3: “The Bible is just another religious book.” Unlike other religious texts, the Bible grounds itself in historical events. Christianity rises or falls not on abstract philosophy but on real history (1 Corinthians 15:14 NIV).

Conclusion: A Credible Word

From historical testimony and manuscript evidence to fulfilled prophecy and archaeological confirmation, to theological coherence and transformative power—the evidence points strongly to yes. The Bible stands unique among ancient writings, trustworthy in its claims, and authoritative in its message.

Yet, credibility is not merely about intellectual persuasion. Ultimately, Scripture calls each reader to trust not only in a book, but in the God who speaks through it. The credibility of the Bible finds its highest confirmation when its words lead us to the living Christ, the Word made flesh (John 1:14 NIV).

References

Aland, K., & Aland, B. (1989). The text of the New Testament: An introduction to the critical editions and to the theory and practice of modern textual criticism (Rev. ed., E. F. Rhodes, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Bauckham, R. (2017). Jesus and the eyewitnesses: The gospels as eyewitness testimony (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Blomberg, C. L. (2007). The historical reliability of the Gospels (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

Bruce, F. F. The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? InterVarsity Press, 1960.

Glueck, Nelson. Rivers in the Desert: A History of the Negev. Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1959.

Finkelstein, I., & Mazar, A. (2007). The quest for the historical Israel: Debating archaeology and the history of early Israel. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.

Gibson, S. (2009). The final days of Jesus: The archaeological evidence. New York, NY: HarperOne.

Kitchen, K. A. (2003). On the reliability of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

McRay, J. (1991). Archaeology and the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Mazar, E. (2002). The complete guide to the Temple Mount excavations. Jerusalem: Shoham Academic Research.

Shanks, H. (Ed.). (1975–present). Biblical Archaeology Review. Washington, DC: Biblical Archaeology Society.

Wood, B. G. (1990). Did the Israelites conquer Jericho? A new look at the archaeological evidence. Biblical Archaeology Review, 16(2), 44–58.

Younger, K. L., Jr. (1990). Ancient conquest accounts: A study in ancient Near Eastern and biblical history writing. Sheffield, UK: JSOT Press.

Comfort, P. W. (2005). Encountering the manuscripts: An introduction to New Testament paleography and textual criticism. Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Academic.

Ehrman, B. D. (2005). Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the Bible and why. New York, NY: HarperOne.

Metzger, B. M., & Ehrman, B. D. (2005). The text of the New Testament: Its transmission, corruption, and restoration (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Parker, D. C. (1997). The living text of the Gospels. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ramsay, William. The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament. Hodder & Stoughton, 1915.

Stoner, Peter. Science Speaks: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible. Moody Press, 1958.

Wallace, D. B. (2011). Revisiting the reliability of the New Testament manuscripts. In R. B. Stewart (Ed.), The reliability of the New Testament: Bart D. Ehrman and Daniel B. Wallace in dialogue (pp. 21–45). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Tov, E. (2012). Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

VanderKam, J. C., & Flint, P. W. (2002). The meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Their significance for understanding the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.